USPTO serial 77338824
Serial No. 77338824
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77338824?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Brunswick, NJ
New Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jake D. Feldman
JAMES D WEINBERGER FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZA6TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | mint flavored fluoride rinse | ABANDONED | Feb 24, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2009 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |