USPTO serial 77338943
PRO-SCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO-SCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian McNamara and Norm J. Rich
BRIAN MCNAMARA FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K STREET NWSUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Face and body epidermal cleansers, face and body cleansing milks, face tonic lotions, non-medicated eye treatment creams, non-medicated face and body treatment creams and lotions, face and body protection creams and lotions, namely, cosmetic sun protecting preparations, non-medicated lip protectors, non-medicated eye treatment gels, face and body treatment gels, namely, after shave gels, bath gels, after sun gels; eye masks, face and body masks, beauty vials of concentrated cosmetic active ingredients for external use of face and body, namely, beauty serums, essential oils for personal use; face and body exfoliators, namely, skin exfoliants, exfoliant creams, bath milks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |