USPTO serial 77339219
PIZZA FUSION FRESH, ORGANIC EARTH FRIENDLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIZZA FUSION FRESH, ORGANIC EARTH FRIENDLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Harrison
BRIAN HARRISON THE LAW FIRM OF BRIAN HARRISON1776 I Street, N.W.Ninth FloorWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Carry-out restaurants; Restaurant services; Restaurants; Restaurants featuring home delivery; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |