Drawing for CPS ENERGY WINDTRICITY

USPTO serial 77339565

CPS ENERGY WINDTRICITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CPS ENERGY WINDTRICITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David D'Zurilla

David D'Zurilla Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.P.O. Box 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Procurement services, namely, purchasing electricity generated by using wind as the primary energy source for othersACTIVE
039Public utility services, namely, the transmission and distribution of electricity generated by using wind as the primary energy sourceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 7, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 24, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 10, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Mar 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 14, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 5, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Dec 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance