Drawing for GROW MODERN ORGANIC KIDS

USPTO serial 77340522

GROW MODERN ORGANIC KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROW MODERN ORGANIC KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. O'Connell, Jr.

ROBERT M. O'CONNELL, JR. GOODWIN PROCTER LLPEXCHANGE PLACE, 53 STATE STREETATTN: TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services in the field of babies' and children's furniture, accessories, strollers and clothingACTIVENov 17, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 5, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 2, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 3, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 20, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 5, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Dec 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance