Drawing for I CARE I CURE FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 77340889

I CARE I CURE FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I CARE I CURE FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald L. Hofer

RONALD L. HOFER LAW OFFICES OF RONALD L. HOFER122 LINDBERGH LNMOORESVILLE, NC 28117-8421UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable fund raising services, namely raising, accepting, and administering charitable contributions for childhood cancer awareness programs, childhood cancer education programs and childhood cancer research programsACTIVEApr 3, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 2, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 2, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 2, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Nov 6, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 6, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 6, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 17, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 17, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 13, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 13, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 14, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance