USPTO serial 77341153
YURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chungcheongnam-do, KR
Chungcheongbuk-do, KR
Gyeonggi-do, KR
Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Y. Park
JAE Y. PARK CANTOR COLBURN LLP1800 DIAGONAL RD STE 510ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2860UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mills for household purposes, other than hand-operated; Electric mixer for household purpose; Electric washing machines for household purpose; Electric whisks for household purposes; Electric fruit presses for household purposes; Electric grinders for household purposes; Electric crushers for household purposes; Electric blenders for household purposes; Electric vacuum cleaner for household purpose; Coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; Pepper mills other than hand-operated; Washing machines; Dishwashers; Spin driers; Automatic dish washes; Electric washing machines; Shoe polishers, electric; Electric can openers; Electric Machines and apparatus for Carpet shampooing ; Bags for using in vacuum cleaner; Electric vacuum cleaner; Vacuum cleaners; Vacuum cleaner hoses; Robot vacuum cleaner for household purpose Robots; Robots machines; Machines for processing semi-conductor; Machines for processing semi-conductor silicon wafer; Automatic handling machines; Handling apparatus for loading and unloading | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SelimTech Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sewonecs Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Yura Co.,Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Yuraeltech Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named YURA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |