USPTO serial 77341409
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Pandiscio
MARK J. PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO, P.C.470 TOTTEN POND RD STE 4WALTHAM, MA 02451-1933UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Laboratory ventilation hoods for the safe handling of chemical and biochemical substances | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 5, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |