USPTO serial 77341864
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J ROSENBERG
MICHAEL A SHIMOKAJI SHIMOKAJI & ASSOCIATES PC8911 RESEARCH DRIVEIRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE FOR THE ENCRYPTION, DECRYPTION, COMPRESSION, PROTECTION, RETENTION AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA, FILES AND INFORMATION; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MANUALS, HANDBOOKS, AND GUIDES FEATURING INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE FOR THE ENCRYPTION, DECRYPTION, COMPRESSION, PROTECTION, RETENTION AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA, FILES AND INFORMATION RECORDED ON ELECTRONIC MEDIA | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |