CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PRINTEXPERT

USPTO serial 77342110

PRINTEXPERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRINTEXPERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

JEFFREY M. FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT RDUTICA, OH 43080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Equipment for printing houses, namely, sheet-fed printing presses, web-fed printing presses, cutting machines and binding, stitching and folding equipment, namely, machines for binding, stitching and folding printed materialsACTIVE—
035Trading of equipment for printing houses, namely, retail sales featuring sheet-fed printing presses, web-fed printing presses, cutting machines and document binding, stitching and folding machines for industrial useACTIVE—
037Maintenance and repair of equipment for printing houses, namely, sheet-fed printing presses, web-fed printing presses, machines for binding, stitching and folding printed materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance