USPTO serial 77342357
INSTANT ROCKSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTANT ROCKSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laverton, AU
Laverton, AU
Laverton, AU
Laverton, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carlo F. Van den Bosch
Carlo F. Van den Bosch SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP650 Town Center DriveFourth FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Talcum powder; non-medicated hair care preparations; hair styling preparations; cologne and eau de toilette; hair bleaching preparations and lighteners; shaving creams and gels; gels for hair; lotions for hair; after-shave lotions; perfumery; dentifrices; hair treatments, also known as hair relaxers and permanent wave solutions; lotions for hair straightening and hair waving, shampoos/conditioner, styling creams and waxes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ozdare Academy Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Ozdare Academy Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Ozdare Academy Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Ozdare Academy Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named INSTANT ROCKSTAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |