Drawing for NEARBYNOW

USPTO serial 77342875

NEARBYNOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3585441Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEARBYNOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen S. Frank

KAREN S FRANK COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLPONE MONTGOMERY STREETSUITE 3000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Operating online marketplaces for sellers of goods and/or services; advertising services; namely, promoting the goods and services of others through search engine referral traffic analysis and reporting and mobile advertising; providing online directory information services also featuring hyperlinks to other websites; online services, namely, ordering and inventory monitoring featuring product reservation capability for apparel, electronics, and household itemsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDDec 19, 2005
042Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a computer network; providing search platforms to allow users to send and receive content on a mobile deviceSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDDec 19, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2018C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Nov 5, 2018CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 15, 2018CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Mar 26, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 17, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 7, 2017PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 30, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 30, 2014C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 8, 2014815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
May 8, 2014E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 15, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 12, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 10, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 7, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance