Drawing for TRIGML

USPTO serial 77344011

TRIGML

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIGML?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Christopher Norton, Esq.

N. Christopher Norton, Esq. Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Ave., NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication, data communications, and electronic communications installations, apparatus, instruments and circuits, namely, cellular telephone systems consisting essentially of cellular phones, wireless network sensors, computer hardware in the nature of wireless computer network extenders and repeaters, and routers; apparatus for the transmission, reception, storage, display or searching of electronic data, and/or sound, and/or images, namely, computer hardware; mobile telephone apparatus; mobile telephone systems consisting essentially of mobile phones, wireless network sensors, computer hardware in the nature of wireless computer network extenders and repeaters, and routers; data processing apparatus; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; computer and electronic software programs for data processing apparatus and/or telecommunications apparatus; software programs for mobile telephone apparatus; telephone systems consisting essentially of wireless application computer protocol programs; downloadable software programs supplied on-line from databases or from the internet for application development platforms for mobile telephones; telecommunications apparatus, namely, cellular phones sold with computer software enabling wired or wireless connection to databases and/or to the internet; data carriers pre-recorded with computer or other programs for application development platforms for mobile telephonesACTIVE—
016Instructional and teaching materials for the telecommunications and technology industries; training and instructional books and manuals for the telecommunications and technology industriesACTIVE—
042Professional technology consultancy services relating to the field of telecommunications; professional technological consultancy services relating to mobile telephony; design and development of mobile telephone apparatus, mobile telephone systems, and/or of applications therefor; design, development and up-dating of software programs for mobile telephone apparatus and/or mobile telephone systems, including wireless application protocol programs; design and development of integrated computer hardware, and/or computer programs, and/or mobile telephone apparatus, and/or mobile telephone systems; providing technical information relating to the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 1, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 17, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance