Drawing for TEAM TEES

USPTO serial 77344554

TEAM TEES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TEAM TEES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf teesACTIVESep 30, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2010WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2010WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 1, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 31, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance