USPTO serial 77344580
COCOA VIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COCOA VIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell
LESLIE K. MITCHELL ARENT FOX LLP1675 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019-5820UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bakery desserts, bakery goods, bakery products, bases for making milk shakes, bonbons, breakfast cereals, brownies, bubble gum, cake mixes, cakes, candy cake decorations, candy coated apples, candy coated popcorn, candy decorations for cakes, candy mints, cappuccino, caramel popcorn, caramels, cereal based snack food, chocolate chips, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate fondue, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, chocolate mousse, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate truffles, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies, cocoa, cocoa mixes, coffee, coffee-based beverage containing milk, cones for ice cream, confectionery chips for baking, cookies, crackers, dessert mousse, dessert souffles, dough, doughnuts, dulce de leche, dumplings, eclairs, edible cake decorations, edible decorations for cakes, espresso, extracts used as flavoring, flavored and sweetened gelatines, flavored ices, flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts, flavoring syrup, flour, frosting mixes, frostings, frozen confections, frozen custards, frozen yogurt, granola, ice, ice cream, ice cream drinks, ice cream substitute, icing, icing mixes, marshmallow topping, marshmallows, meals consisting primarily of frozen, prepared or packaged pasta or rice, milk shakes, mixes for bakery goods, muesli, muffins, natural sweetener, oatmeal, pancake mixes, pancake syrup, pancakes, parfaits, pasties, pastries, pies, popped popcorn, processed cereals, processed grains, processed oats, processed popcorn, processed unpopped popcorn, propolis for food purposes, puddings, puffed corn snacks, rice cakes, rolled oats, rolls, bread, sauces, seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry, seasonings, shakes, sherbet, snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, and/or popped popcorn, sorbet, soy-based ice cream substitute, sugar, sugar substitutes, table syrup, tapioca, tarts, tea, tea for infusions, tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring, topping syrup, and waffles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |