USPTO serial 77344695
ICONIC GAMES AND SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICONIC GAMES AND SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Starshak
KATHRYN STARSHAK BELL, BOYD & LLOYD LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Game, entertainment, recreational and amusement machines and apparatus, namely, video game machines for use with televisions; gaming machines; machines for playing games of chance in the nature of fruit machines; housings, namely, cabinets adapted to gaming machines; controlling apparatus, namely, reel mechanism controllers, mother boards, modular units in the nature of R.O.M.; software for operating machines used in the gaming industry; upgrade and modification kits for the aforesaid goods comprising updated versions of the above-listed software, equipment and apparatus, and component parts for all the aforesaid goods and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, namely, controllers, displays, button panels, bolsters, electrical wiring, and computer hardware and software associated therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Game, entertainment, recreational and amusement machines and apparatus, namely arcade-type electronic education video games, coin-operated video games, hand-held unit for playing video games, stand-alone video game machines, stand-alone video output game machines, amusement game machines, LCD game machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of casino facilities featuring gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus; rental of gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus; advisory and consultancy services relating to gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus; operation of gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus at sites for entertainment and amusement purposes; arranging contests and competitions in relation to the playing of games with gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus; providing gaming, entertainment and amusement services on video and computer systems and via on-line internet and other network communications and via interactive television services; club services, namely, preferred customer incentive programs for patrons of gaming facilities; provision of entertainment information regarding gaming and gaming apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Iconic Games and Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ICONIC GAMES AND SYSTEMS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |