USPTO serial 77344755
AIT LABORATORIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIT LABORATORIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William S. Fultz
William S. Fultz Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1400Raleigh, NC 27601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | [ Materials testing and evaluation, namely, providing evaluation testing for pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and chemical concentrations and compositions; materials testing and evaluation, namely, pre-clinical and non-clinical evaluation testing of pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and chemical products; pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and chemical research and development for others; ] Providing reagent sample testing and diagnostic services for others in the fields of science and research related thereto; Performing scientific research or providing scientific research services to identify the most informative, effective and efficient panels of biomarkers to aid in the new drug development and clinical trial process; Scientific research and development, namely, providing biomarker-related technical consulting, scientific research, assay development, and testing services to support new drug development and clinical trials; Conducting scientific research related to the discovery and identification of novel biomarkers of interest; [ Providing scientific research services to pharmaceutical companies, Contract Research Organizations (CROs), and diagnostic testing companies to support the integration of biomarker assays into clinical trials and new drug/product codevelopment efforts; Custom design and development of biochemical assays, including multiplexed assays, to assist with pre-clinical drug development and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic scientific studies; and to assist with clinical trials to evaluate clinical trial safety, efficacy, toxicology, and dosing; ] Consulting services in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes; Forensic toxicology, namely, consulting services in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes; providing information in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes, namely, identification, assays and origin elucidations of controlled substances and the physical and chemical comparisons, individualizations and identifications of trace evidence; Performance of chemical analyses, namely, chemical hazard detection in food, drink and consumer products; [ Environmental testing and inspection services, namely, environmental and community toxicology; ] clinical toxicology; bioanalytical pharmacology; development, modification, applications and validation of analytical method advances for emerging medicinal [ and environmental foreign compound analytes ] and biomarkers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 1993 |
| 044 | Consulting services in the field of forensic examination of victims of crime; drug testing for substance abuse, namely, forensic substance abuse testing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 1993 |
| 045 | [ examination of fingerprints for the purpose of forensic scientific intelligence; ] expert witness services in legal matters in the field of in criminal and civil proceedings involving forensic toxicology and controlled substances, trace evidence and chemical hazard detection in food, drink and consumer products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Institute of Toxicology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named AIT LABORATORIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |