Drawing for LUCID PATENT

USPTO serial 77344851

LUCID PATENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCID PATENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

T. Anthony Jaye

T. ANTHONY JAYE MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN & BRAND, LLP90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and instruction manuals sold as a unit for use in performing legal researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 4, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 3, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 28, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance