USPTO serial 77345281
XOSOLAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XOSOLAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | (Based on Intent to Use) Construction consultation; Construction of buildings; Construction planning; Residential and building construction consulting; Steel structure construction works | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Architectural and engineering services; Civil engineering; Consulting in the fields of engineering and architecture; Drawing up of plans and engineering drawings; Engineering; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the use of solar energy; Environmental services, namely, technical consultation in the field of environmental science, engineering services, design for others in the field of environmental engineering, designing and testing of new environmentally friendly products for others; Mechanical engineering; Research relating to mechanical engineering; Technology consultation and research in the field of solar energy | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 7, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |