USPTO serial 77346508
MICROPACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3881795Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2010
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROPACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Amherst, CA
Amherst, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. Lockwood
Robert H.G. Lockwood Miller & Martin PLLC1170 Peachtreet Street N.E., Suite 800Atlanta, GA 30309-7706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | plastic films used as packaging for food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |