Drawing for CLARITY OF VISION

USPTO serial 77346700

CLARITY OF VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLARITY OF VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence R. Robins

Lawrence R. Robins FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER L.L901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical diagnostic reagents; reagents and kits comprising reagents and processing chemicals for use in obstetrics, gynecology and women's health; diagnostic test kits comprised of analytes used as markers or indicators for detecting diseases for use in screening women at risk of pre-term delivery and for use in assessing the risk of pre-term delivery and infertility; bioassay reagents and kits comprised of bioassay reagents, chemicals and/or solutions for in vitro medical uses in obstetrics, gynecology and women's health, in particular for detecting and/or diagnosing female reproductive disorders and pre-term birthACTIVE—
009House mark and brand name for laboratory apparatus and instruments for use in screening for osteoporosis, cervical cancer, and breast cancerACTIVE—
010House mark and brand name for medical apparatus and instruments used for the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer, namely, breast imaging systems, breast biopsy devices and biopsy image guidance systems, and systems for partial-breast irradiation; house mark and brand name for medical apparatus and instruments used for the detection and diagnosis of osteoporosis, namely, x-ray bone densitometers, x-ray imaging devices, and MRI diagnostic apparatus; house mark and brand name for medical apparatus and instruments used for the detection and diagnosis of cervical cancer, namely, a slide sample imaging system; house mark and brand name for medical apparatus and instruments used for surgery to correct excessive menstrual bleeding; house mark and brand name for medical apparatus and instruments used for the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of medical conditions in the fields of women's health, obstetrics and gynecology, namely, medical and surgical instruments for gynecological use and female sterilizationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 1, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 6, 2009GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 7, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance