Drawing for Y

USPTO serial 77346764

Y

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Y?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Dirksen

Thomas A. Dirksen Thomas A. Dirksen, Attorney at Law4607 Lakeview Canyon Road, Suite 117Westlake Village, CA 91361UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Providing information from searchable indexes and databases of information, including text, electronic documents, databases, graphics and audio visual information, by means of global computer information networks in the field of social networking and on-line datingABANDONEDJan 15, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 16, 2009GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 16, 2009CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 30, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance