USPTO serial 77347485
CRITICALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRITICALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clearwater, MN
Alington, VA
Arlington, VA
Stanford, Ann M., RN, President, Criticality, Inc
Coden, AL
Other trademarks owned by Stanford, Ann M., RN, President, Criticality, Inc
Coden, AL
Newberry, FL
Newberry, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harrison, Troy V.
- Other trademarks owned by Foster, Stephanie A.
- Other trademarks owned by Hill, Nicholas C.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanford, Ann M., RN, President, Criticality, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Criticality, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Franklin, Jean Renee
- Other trademarks owned by Franklin, Taylor L.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CRITICALITY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |