CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DURACHIP

USPTO serial 77348193

DURACHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURACHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cassandra L. Wilkinson

Cassandra L. Wilkinson Head, Johnson & Kachigian228 West 17th PlaceTulsa, OK 74119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, chip sealing aggregates in the nature of asphalt, bitumen, sand, gravel, crushed stone, slag, and recycled concrete; surface dressing made of asphalt and bitumen; wearing course made of asphalt and bitumen; overlay made of asphalt and bitumen; floors; asphalt, emulsified asphalt, pitch and bitumen asphaltACTIVE—
037Construction and repair services in the field of roads, highways, and other traffic ways and surfaces utilizing non-metallic building materials for road surface treatment in the nature of chip sealing aggregates, surface dressing made of asphalt and bitumen, asphalt emulsions, wearing course, overlay, floors, asphalt, pitch and bitumen asphaltACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 11, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance