USPTO serial 77348999
TSUNAMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TSUNAMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver S. Bajracharya
Oliver S. Bajracharya Christie, Parker & Hale, LLPP.O. Box 7068Pasadena, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BRAKE ROTORS FOR MOTORCYCLES AND OFF-ROAD VEHICLES | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |