USPTO serial 77349188
AJICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AJICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
PERLA M. KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soups; soup stocks; preparations for soups; instant soup mixes; bouillon; concentrated bouillon; broth; concentrated broth; meat extracts; dried meat; frozen meat; cooked meat; dried fish; frozen fish; cooked fish; dried shellfish; frozen shellfish; cooked shellfish; dried poultry; frozen poultry; cooked poultry; dried vegetables; frozen vegetables; cooked vegetables; canned meat; canned vegetables; canned fish; frozen fruits; preserved fruits; dried fruits; eggs; milk, yoghurt; cheese; butter; margarine; lactic acid drinks; edible oils and fats; vegetable salads, jelly, processed nuts, tofu | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; artificial coffee; coffee substitutes; soluble coffee; sugar; natural sweeteners; honey; treacle; rice; tapioca; sago; processed cereals; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foods, ready to eat, cereal derived food bars, ready-to-eat cereals; flour for food; preparations made from flour, namely, flour-based chips, flour-based gnocchi; hot cake mixes; pancake mixes; bread; pastry; pastas; confectionery, namely, fondants, confectionery chips for baking, frozen confectionery, fruit jellies, peanut butter confectionery chips; candy; sweets; ices; yeast; baking-powder; noodles; instant noodles; processed foods consisting primarily of rice, noodles, dumplings and pasta; cooked foods, namely, Chinese stuffed dumplings, bread and buns with fillings, stir fried rice; frozen foods, namely, frozen noodles for soups, frozen rice cake sweets, frozen Chinese stuffed dumplings, frozen rice balls, frozen congee or porridge, frozen bread or buns with fillings, frozen stir fried rice, frozen shaomai, namely, a steamed meat, seafood or vegetable mixture wrapped with rice pastry wrappers; frozen samosa, namely, triangular pastry filled with seafood, meat and vegetables; frozen spring rolls, namely, rice pastry wrappers with fillings; meat tenderizers; meat gravies; salt; mustard; pepper; vinegar; sauces; spices; seasonings; flavorings except for essential oil; flavor enhancers except for essential oil; salad dressings; mayonnaise; seasoned breading mixes for use on meat, poultry, seafood and vegetables; seasoned batter mixes for use on meat, poultry, seafood and vegetables; seasoned coating mixes for use on meat, poultry, seafood and vegetables; ready mixed breading for deep fry use; seasoned salt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |