USPTO serial 77349423
DANZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DANZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Laurent, CA
ST-LAURENT, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire
MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA, ESQUIRE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE ST STE 25BOSTON, MA 02109-1816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely, deodorants, hair care preparations, makeup, nail polish, perfumery, skin care preparations, skin soaps for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, namely, bracelets, brooches, earrings, necklaces, rings, watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | briefcases, business card cases, leather bags, handbags, wallets, purses, all purpose carry and travel bags, namely, luggage, luggage tags, athletic bags, backpacks, canvas bags, carry-all bags, daypacks, duffel bags, fanny packs, mesh shopping bags, nylon shopping bags, rucksacks, schoolbags, umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing and accessories, namely, jeans, shorts, skirts, dresses, Bermuda pants, sweatpants, overalls, jumpers, pants, slacks, trousers, shirts, blouses, pullovers, t-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, polo shirts, sweaters, suits, blazers, cardigans, jerseys, socks, underwear, boxer shorts, slips, briefs, panties, teddies, bras, nighties, undershirts, nightgowns, pajamas, dressing gowns, tights, camisoles, gauchos, leggings, bathing suits and swimwear, bikinis, jogging suits, track pants, vests, jackets, coats, anoraks, parkas, ponchos, raincoats, shells, headwear, namely, hats, caps, earbands, toques, visors, clothing accessories, namely, ascots, ties, belts, handkerchiefs, mittens, gloves, shawls, scarves, neck warmers, waistbands, sarongs, footwear, namely, boots, sandals, shoes, slippers, flip-flops | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring sale of clothing, bags, personal care products, jewelry and fashion accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 9101-2096 Quebec Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BASCO IP L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DANZ
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |