Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77349515?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77349515. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FRAXEL RE:MOVE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77349515, the listed owner(s) include: Reliant Technologies, Inc., Reliant Technologies, Inc., RELIANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 77349515?

Serial number 77349515 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FRAXEL RE:MOVE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover FRAXEL RE:MOVE?

The public record lists International Classes: 010, 044. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 77349515

FRAXEL RE:MOVE

Q: What is the current status of FRAXEL RE:MOVE?

FRAXEL RE:MOVE (77349515) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Dec 11, 2007
Status date: Dec 20, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: HERMAN, RUSS
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRAXEL RE:MOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Reliant Technologies, Inc.
Mountain View, CA
Other trademarks owned by Reliant Technologies, Inc.
Reliant Technologies, Inc.
Mountain View, CA
Other trademarks owned by Reliant Technologies, Inc.
RELIANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
HAYWARD, CA
Other trademarks owned by RELIANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
010	Lasers for medical and cosmetic use	ACTIVE	—
044	Plastic surgery, dermatological, and cosmetic treatment services, namely, laser hair removal	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 4, 2013	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Apr 24, 2013	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 29, 2010	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2010	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Dec 20, 2010	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2010	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
May 20, 2010	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
May 18, 2010	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
May 18, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2010	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Jan 7, 2010	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Nov 17, 2009	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Nov 17, 2009	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2009	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
May 18, 2009	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
May 18, 2009	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
May 18, 2009	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Nov 18, 2008	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jul 24, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jul 24, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 24, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jul 18, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 18, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 18, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Dec 15, 2007	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	—
Dec 14, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—