USPTO serial 77350014
CORNBOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORNBOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A. SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, P.A.3433 BROADWAY STREET NESUITE 401 BROADWAY PLACE EASTMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria or Rhizobacteria for Corn | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |