USPTO serial 77350271
NICOCLEANSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NICOCLEANSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Uhlir, Reg. No. 25,096
JAMES R. UHLIR, REG. NO. 25,096 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1420 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations in liquid, pill, tablet, caplet, gum or powder form for removing tobacco residues and by-products from the gastrointestinal tract and the oral cavity; Preparations in liquid, pill, tablet, caplet, gum or powder form for removing tobacco residues and by-products from the gastrointestinal tract and the oral cavity; Preparations in liquid, pill, tablet, caplet, gum or powder form for removing tobacco residues and by-products from the gastrointestinal tract and the oral cavity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |