USPTO serial 77350358
RISK INSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RISK INSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gavin N. Manning
GAVIN N. MANNING OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA LLP601 WEST CORDOVA STREETSUITE 480, THE STATIONVANCOUVER, B.C., V6B1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, software for performing financial calculations and software developer's kits consisting of computer software function libraries, plug-ins for computer programming environments and interfaces to computer systems for use in writing computer software that includes financial functions; downloadable electronic publications, namely, manuals and user guides for finance-related computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing an on-line computer web site for performing financial calculations; consulting in the field of finance and performing financial calculations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | custom computer software development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |