Drawing for INTELLISPECT

USPTO serial 77350411

INTELLISPECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTELLISPECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dickson M. Lupo

J. Mark Wilson Moore & Van Allen, PLLC100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011LED lighting for indoor and outdoor lighting fixtures, namely, lamps, chandeliers, table lamps, vanity lighting, floor lamps, sconces, garden lighting, landscape lighting, ceiling fan lighting, utility lighting; ceiling fans; flashlightsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 17, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 17, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 17, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 20, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance