Drawing for ILERT

USPTO serial 77350938

ILERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander F. Guidr

Alexander F. Guidr Mockbee Hall Drake & Hodge, P.A.125 S. Congress St., Suite 1820JACKSON, MS 39201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; Computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer software for use in customer relationship management (CRM); Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interfaceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 7, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 1, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 14, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 16, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 16, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 6, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2008GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
May 9, 2008GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
May 9, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance