Drawing for FLOWMASTER EXHAUST EXPERT

USPTO serial 77351791

FLOWMASTER EXHAUST EXPERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FLOWMASTER EXHAUST EXPERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sharon R. Smith

Sharon R. Smith MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPOne Market, Spear Street TowerSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Posters; Informational sheets about mufflers and muffler installationACTIVEMar 3, 2008
025Hats; Shirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirtsACTIVEMar 3, 2008
041Educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of sales and installation of automobile exhaust productsACTIVEMar 3, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 3, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 15, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 15, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 21, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 21, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance