USPTO serial 77351795
SPYNTELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPYNTELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patchen M. Haggerty
PATCHEN M. HAGGERTY DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1420 5TH AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-4010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic intrusion detection, monitoring and automatic telephone dialers, sold individually or as integrated systems; Central monitoring station devices, namely, automatic telephone answering machines; alarm receivers for telephones for identifying callers and decoding alarm and monitoring signals; output devices, namely, video display computer terminals and printers; Computer software for use in programming remote alarm panels; Fire detection systems and devices, namely, fire detectors, smoke detectors, alarm electric control panels, automatic telephone dialers, back-up cellular telephones, and back-up wireless radios and AC and DC power supplies; Access control systems and devices, namely, electronic card access readers, code access computer terminal, computer keypads, electric control panels, electric locks and electric lock actuators; Computer hardware, namely, computer hardware for telecommunications enabling computers to block automated marketing telephone calls | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of intrusion detection systems and integration of related security devices; Design for others in the field of computer hardware, namely, computer hardware for telecommunications enabling computers to block automated marketing telephone calls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2011 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |