USPTO serial 77351956
E-CHARGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-CHARGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole E. Denatale
Denise I. Mroz Woodcock Washburn LLPCira Centre, 12th Floor2929 Arch StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Photographic chemicals for photographic applications, graphic and reprographic | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Toners intended for computer printers, photocopiers, refill toner cartridges, and printing inks | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Disinfectants for hygienic purposes for medical use; pesticides; insecticides for killing insects and vermin | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Printing machines for commercial or industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific apparatus, namely, sensing and signaling devices for measurement and quality control of materials and processing by laser; surveying machines and instruments; cinematographic machines and apparatus; apparatus and instruments for conveying, distributing . transforming, storing, regulating or controlling electric current; navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of on-board computers; computer telephony software; global positioning system (GPS); apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound or pictures; computer peripherals; printers for computers, facsimile machines, photocopiers, scanners, magnetic encoded card readers, radio transmitters, earphones, electronic amusement apparatus adapted for use with television receivers only, blank tapes for storage of computer data, electric wires; electric relays; apparatus for transmission of communication, fall protection products, namely, beam grips and gloves for protection against accidents, burglar alarms against theft; none of the foregoing are specifically directed to on-line bill payment services | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Esthetic massage apparatus; esthetic massage kits primarily comprised of massage apparatus, gloves for massage, and massage oils and also containing exfoliants for reinforcements, relaxation, muscular stimulation, stimulating the body against pain and processing of skin | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Light diffusers, diffusers for torch lamps, electric lighting fixtures, central heating radiators, refrigerating machines, ventilation apparatus, namely, cordless floor drying cone dolly, air conditioning apparatus, light diffusers; electric lamps, lighting lamps, torch lamps, safety lamps for underground use, lighting apparatus for vehicles; devices for generating smoke for signaling, light bulbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Projectiles, signal rockets | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | Electronic musical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed forms; photographs; printed clichés, letterhead paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kapa Reynolds, SA
- Other trademarks owned by Kapa Reynolds, SA
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named E-CHARGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |