Drawing for Serial No. 77352489

USPTO serial 77352489

Serial No. 77352489

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77352489?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J. MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FL 4ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009glasses, namely, eyeglasses, sunglassesACTIVE—
018Bags, namely, tote bags, athletic bags, clothes bags, travel bags, sports bags, backpacks, luggage bags, all-purpose carrying bagsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, sweaters, t-shirts, camisoles, cardigans, turtlenecks, shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, jerseys, suits, jumpsuits, overalls, blouses, dresses, skirts, pants, jeans, bermuda shorts, shorts, ski suits, blazers, coats, jackets, overcoats, parkas, anoraks, raincoats, jogging suits, pyjamas, nightgowns, nigh ties, dressing gowns, bathrobes, sleeping garments, underclothing, slips, boxer shorts, uniforms, beachwear, swim suits, neckties, hats, caps, berets, toques, headbands, bandannas, ear muffs; clothing accessories, namely, gloves, mittens, belts, suspenders, scarvesACTIVE—
035Retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring clothing, clothing accessories, footwear, bags and glassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 20, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 11, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 14, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 23, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 1, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 26, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance