Drawing for FRESH FLOWER SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 77354190

FRESH FLOWER SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH FLOWER SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E Lynn Perry

E. Lynn Perry Perry IP Group A.L.C.900 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRSte 226Larkspur, CA 94939

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training in the proper use of equipment and materials for monitoring, recording, controlling and adjusting the atmosphere in containers and packages for atmosphere-controlled shipment of live plants and cut flowersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 26, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 1, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 1, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 18, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance