USPTO serial 77354494
WYNAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2009
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WYNAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
East West International Corporation
Secaucus, NJ
Other trademarks owned by East West International Corporation
East West International Corporation
Secaucus, NJ
Other trademarks owned by East West International Corporation
East West International Corporation
Secaucus, NJ
Other trademarks owned by East West International Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tini Thomas, Esq.
TINI THOMAS, ESQ. TINI THOMAS, ESQ., LLC510 ALEXANDER AVELINDEN, NJ 07036-1437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit-based dry snack foods, namely, banana chips, jackfruit chips, fried fruit chips, and achappam (fruit chips); food items, namely, pickles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 1995 |
| 030 | Spices, sauces, coffee, tea, flour, rice, sugar, candy, bakery products, rice-based snack foods, rice flour, sesame balls, peanut balls; frozen vegetarian food and ready to eat Indian food, namely, porotta (flatbread), idlly (rice cake), idlly with sambar (rice cake with soup flavorings), chappathi (bread), masala dosa (crepes); hot mixture comprised primarily of spices; food items, namely, rice flakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by East West International Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by East West International Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by East West International Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named WYNAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |