USPTO serial 77354598
ALOTTAWATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALOTTAWATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M. LABARGE MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DR STE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606-6357UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Waterslide amusement park services; children's camp services, namely, recreational camps and summer camps | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Resort services, namely, resort lodging services; restaurant services; conference center services, namely, the provision of conference, exhibition and meeting facilities; snack bar services; child care services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALOTTAWATA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALOTTAWATA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lottawata Waterpark Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ALOTTAWATA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |