USPTO serial 77355092
IGUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IGUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Johnston
STEPHEN BROWN IGUIDE MEDIA LLCCORPORATION TRUST CENTER1209 ORANGE ST SUITE 123WILMINGTON, DE 19801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | communications and telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of audio and video material and data on the Internet, intranets, extranets, mobile communication, cellular and satellite networks, excluding television and video program listings and information, and interactive or electronic program guides related to television or video programming: provision of access to web pages, namely, provision of access to electronic sites; transmission and distribution of data or audio-visual images via the Internet, intranets. extranets, mobile communication, cellular and satellite networks;electronic transmission and retrieval of data, images, audio, video, documents, text, cards,letters, messages, mail, animations, and electronic mail, excluding television and video program listings and information, and interactive or electronic program guides related to television or video programming, over local or global communications networks, namely,the Internet. intranets, extranets, mobile communication, cellular and satellite networks:electronic transmission of computer software over local or global communications networks, namely, the Internet, intranets. extranets, mobile communication, cellular, and satellite networks, excluding television and video program listings and information, and interactive or electronic program guides related to television or video programming:providing access to databases and local or global communications networks, namely, the Internet, intranets, extranets, mobile communication, cellular, and satellite networks,internet service provider services, telecommunication services for the dissemination of,information by mobile telephone, namely, the transmission of data to mobile telephones,excluding television and video program listings and information, and interactive or electronic program guides related to television or video programming: providing information in the field of telecommunications. excluding television and video program listings and information, and interactive or electronic program guides related to television or video programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |