USPTO serial 77355385
ACCELE-GRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3608179Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2009
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCELE-GRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher W. Brody
CHRISTOPHER W. BRODY CLARK & BRODY1090 VERMONT AVE NW STE 250WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Growth enhancing fertilizer supplement for agricultural use | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Accelegrow Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Accelegrow Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Accelegrow Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named ACCELE-GRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |