USPTO serial 77355692
BLOOM PHAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLOOM PHAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph C. Francis
KIMBERLY A ECKHART WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 CALIFORNIA STREET 39TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5894UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR USE IN AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY FOR THE TREATMENT OF TREES, BUSHES, PLANTS AND SEEDS, NAMELY, SOIL AMENDMENTS AND WETTING AGENTS FOR SOIL, PEAT-MEDIA AND TURF; FERTILIZERS FOR SOIL; ORGANIC BASED NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS, PLANT AND FUNGI EXTRACTS FOR USE AS A PLANT GROWTH STIMULANT; FLOWER BLOOM STIMULANTS FOR PLANT GROWTH; AND MANURES IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 1 | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |