Drawing for V&V SUPREMO CHICO

USPTO serial 77355910

V&V SUPREMO CHICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V&V SUPREMO CHICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael K. Hendershot

MICHAEL K. HENDERSHOT BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP.O. BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029cheese, sour cream, meatACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 29, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 12, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 12, 2008PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 19, 2008ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Jun 24, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 16, 2008PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 9, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance