USPTO serial 77356161
ALASKA CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALASKA CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. John McKay
D. JOHN MCKAY LAW OFFICES OF D. JOHN MCKAY117 E COOK AVEANCHORAGE, AK 99501-1124UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Video broadcasting; Video narrowcasting services; Video-on-demand transmission services; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of podcasts; Internet broadcasting services; Electronic transmission of voice, data and images by television and video broadcasting; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 1993 |
| 041 | Video tape editing; Video tape film production; Video tape recording for others; Videotape production; Videotaping; Production of video discs and tapes; Production of video discs for others; Production of DVDs, videotapes and television programs featuring tourism- and recreation-related content; Production of cable television programs; Production of radio or television programs; Entertainment namely, production of tourism- and recreation-related video content distributed through television networks, through physical media, and through video broadcasting online, video streaming, video podcasting, video narrowcasting, video on-demand transmission services, and other forms of Internet distribution; Education services, namely, providing production and distribution of video content through television networks, through physical media, and through video broadcasting online, video streaming, video podcasting, video narrowcasting, video on-demand transmission services, and other forms of Internet distribution in the fields of tourism and recreation; Distribution of television programming to cable television systems; Distribution of television programs for others; Digital video, audio, and multimedia publishing services | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |