Drawing for AUTOOPTO

USPTO serial 77356272

AUTOOPTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AUTOOPTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D. Bianco

PAUL D. BIANCO FLEIT KAIN GIBBONS GUTMAN BONGINI & BIANCO21355 E DIXIE HWY STE 115MIAMI, FL 33180-1244UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical instruments and apparatus for diagnostic eye examination and for performing ophthalmic medical and surgical procedures and replacement and structural parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 29, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 29, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 29, 2008ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Oct 29, 2008PCBGPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 20, 2008PBPOWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Oct 20, 2008FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Oct 17, 2008ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 24, 2008ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Jun 17, 2008PDCBPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance