USPTO serial 77356483
WATER BEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATER BEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arash Behravesh
ARASH BEHRAVESH LAW OFFICE OF PETER G. KORYTNYK, PLLC650A 15TH ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202-2708UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Children's multiple activity toys sold as a unit with printed Books; Action figures; Baby multiple activity toys; Bendable toys; Board games; Card games; Cat toys; Crib toys; Dice games; Disc toss toys; Dog toys; Dolls; Dolls and accessories therefor; Dolls for playing; Drawing toys; Electric action toys; Electronic action toys; Electronic educational game machines for children; Electronic learning toys; LCD game machines; Memory games; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Paper dolls; Pet toys; Pet toys containing catnip; Pet toys made of rope; Plastic character toys; Play figures; Plush toys; Printed positionable toys for use in children's board games; Puzzles; Radio transmitters for use with radio-controlled toys; Remote control toys, namely robots and plush toys; Sand toys; Sketching toys; Squeezable squeaking toys; Squeeze toys; Stand alone video game machines; Stuffed and plush toys; Stuffed dolls and animals; Stuffed puppets; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toys; Talking electronic press-down toy; Talking toys; Toy action figures; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy animals; Toy animals and accessories therefor; Toy figures; Toy robots; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Toys for domestic pets; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with educational books; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with memory training equipment; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with other toys; Children's multiple activity toys; Fantasy character toys; Infant action crib toys; Infant development toys; Infant toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |