USPTO serial 77356990
COCKPIT1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4203981Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2012
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COCKPIT1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tuttlingen, DE
Tuttlingen, DE
Tuttlingen, DE
78532 TUTTLINGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.
WESLEY W. WHITMYER, JR. Whitmyer IP Group LLC600 Summer StreetStamford, CT 06901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ILLUMINATION AND LIGHTING INSTALLATIONS FOR USE IN PERFORMING SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURES, NAMELY, LIGHTS AS PARTS OF OR AS SPECIAL ACCESSORIES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ENDOSCOPES FOR NON-MEDICAL USE; CAMERAS, IN PARTICULAR CCD CAMERAS, FOR INDUSTRIAL ENDOSCOPY; MICROSCOPES; ADAPTERS AND CABLES FOR CONNECTING CAMERAS TO SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS; PICTURE PRESENTATION AND RECORDING DEVICES, IN PARTICULAR FOR TECHNICAL ENDOSCOPY, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND PERIPHERALS FOR RECORDING, REPRODUCING AND PROCESSING THE RESULTS OF NON-MEDICAL ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURES; TRAINING AND TEACHING APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF ENDOSCOPY AND ENDOSCOPIC APPARATUS FOR USE IN TRAINING, TEACHING AND INSTRUCTING TECHNICIANS ON INSTALLATION AND USE OF ENDOSCOPIC APPARATUS; TEST EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES, NAMELY, TEST AND CHECK DEVICES FOR EXAMINING, TESTING AND CHECKING THE AFOREMENTIONED NON-MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS FOR PROPER FUNCTION; CARRYING CASES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HOLDING THE EQUIPMENT LISTED ABOVE; SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FOR CONTROLLING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS; REMOTE CONTROLS FOR MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS, NAMELY, SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS; CAMERAS, IN PARTICULAR CCD CAMERAS, FOR MEDICAL ENDOSCOPY; PICTURE PRESENTATION AND RECORDING DEVICES, IN PARTICULAR FOR USE IN MEDICAL ENDOSCOPY, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND PERIPHERALS FOR RECORDING, REPRODUCING AND PROCESSING THE RESULTS OF MEDICAL ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURES; CARRYING CASES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HOLDING THE EQUIPMENT LISTED ABOVE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATERIAL, NAMELY, BROCHURES AND INFORMATIONAL FLYERS, LETTERS, AND SHEETS IN THE FIELDS OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by KARL STORZ SE & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named COCKPIT1
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |