Drawing for UN BUEN DOCTOR

USPTO serial 77357097

UN BUEN DOCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UN BUEN DOCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hazel Espinar

230 S. Clark St., #347Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Publication of books; Production of radio programs; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of NEWS; Entertainment in the nature of prerecorded NEWS messages by telephone; Entertainment, namely, a continuing NEWS show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2011INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Mar 16, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 14, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 7, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 7, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 4, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance