Drawing for APERTURE HEALTH

USPTO serial 77357357

APERTURE HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APERTURE HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kit M. Stetina

KIT M. STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Providing health care services, namely, wellness programs; providing personal medical information to individuals and organizationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 23, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 21, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 7, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 28, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 28, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 8, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 19, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance